top of page
Search

The Disconnect Between AI Promises and Actual Business Outcomes

  • Writer: Jimmy Stewart
    Jimmy Stewart
  • Dec 9
  • 3 min read

Every decade has its miracle technology. AI just happens to be the one with better marketing.


Artificial intelligence has become the buzzword that drives boardroom conversations and investment decisions. Yet, many organizations find themselves disappointed when the promised AI revolution fails to deliver clear, measurable results. The gap between what AI vendors sell and what companies actually get is wide and growing. This post unpacks why executives feel pressured to adopt AI quickly, how marketing inflates expectations, and what lies beneath the hype.


The Fear of Missing Out Drives Premature AI Investments


The pressure to keep up with competitors or avoid being left behind pushes many companies to invest in AI before they are ready. This fear of missing out (FOMO) creates a sense of urgency that often bypasses critical assessment of organizational readiness.


  • Companies rush to buy AI solutions without clear goals or understanding of their data infrastructure.


  • Executives feel compelled to announce AI initiatives to signal innovation, even if the groundwork is missing.


  • This leads to projects that stall, underperform, or fail to integrate with existing processes.


For example, a retail chain might invest in AI-powered customer analytics without having clean, centralized customer data. The result is inaccurate insights and wasted budget. The root cause is not AI itself but the lack of preparation.


AI Vendors and Consultants Sell Quick Fixes Instead of Strategic Evolution


Many AI providers pitch their products as easy solutions that will transform business overnight. This framing ignores the complexity of integrating AI into existing systems and workflows.


  • Terms like “intelligent automation” and “digital transformation” sound bold but often mask the reality of incremental improvements.


  • Vendors focus on flashy demos and buzzwords rather than long-term value and change management.


  • Consultants may push AI projects to meet sales targets rather than align with client needs.


A manufacturing company once shared how a vendor promised a fully automated quality control system in weeks. Months later, the system required constant manual intervention and failed to reduce defects. The vendor’s pitch overlooked the need for process redesign and employee training.


Eye-level view of a cluttered desk with scattered AI project documents and a laptop showing graphs
AI project documents scattered on a desk, showing the complexity behind AI implementation

The Real Issue Is Buying the Story, Not the Strategy


Organizations often buy into the narrative of transformation rather than the practical strategy needed to achieve it. The excitement around AI’s potential overshadows the hard work required to make it effective.


  • Companies focus on the promise of AI instead of defining clear business problems to solve.


  • There is a tendency to chase the latest AI trend without aligning with core capabilities.


  • Success depends on a thoughtful approach that includes data quality, talent, process changes, and realistic timelines.


Consider a financial services firm that launched an AI-driven fraud detection system. They invested heavily in technology but neglected to train staff or update workflows. The system flagged many false positives, frustrating users and reducing trust. The missing piece was a comprehensive strategy that combined technology with people and processes.


How Marketing Shapes Unrealistic Expectations


Marketing campaigns for AI often highlight extraordinary success stories and futuristic possibilities. This creates a distorted view of what AI can deliver today.


  • Bold claims about AI replacing jobs or revolutionizing industries fuel hype cycles.


  • Case studies tend to focus on best-case scenarios, ignoring failures or challenges.


  • Executives may feel pressured to justify AI spending based on these inflated promises.


This hype can lead to disillusionment when projects do not meet expectations. It also diverts attention from incremental improvements that build real value over time.


What Executives Should Do Before Buying Into AI


Before committing to AI projects, leaders need to pause and assess readiness carefully. Here are practical steps to consider:


  • Evaluate your data quality and availability. AI depends on clean, relevant data.


  • Define specific business problems and measurable goals for AI initiatives.


  • Assess organizational culture and capacity for change, including skills and processes.


  • Question vendors and consultants about realistic timelines, costs, and outcomes.


  • Plan for ongoing monitoring and adjustment rather than one-time implementation.


Taking these steps reduces the risk of costly failures and helps build a foundation for sustainable AI success.


Looking Ahead: What to Look for Before Your AI Project Starts


Next week, I will share a detailed checklist to guide your AI project from the very beginning. This will include practical advice on selecting the right use cases, preparing your data, and building internal capabilities.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page